Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS152025 PT Tungkal Lintas Bersama
Registry name: IDNIC-TLB-AS-ID - PT Tungkal Lintas Bersama, ID · PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS152025, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 144.79.195.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 673 100% |
| 43.228.175.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 669 99% |
| 2001:df6:7e40::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 323 51% |
AS-SET
PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS152025: AS152025. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS152025 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS152025 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.
| Name | Database | ASNs | Sets | AS152025 in it | Not covered | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS152025 | A single AS number, not a set: AS152025 (this network), 3 route objects. | |||||
Fix list
Nothing to change: every route is RPKI valid with a route object in an RIR database, and every route object is announced.
Route objects not announced
Every route object with origin AS152025 is announced.
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.