Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS149430 TIANFENG-AS-AP - TIANFENG (HONG KONG) COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
Registry name: TIANFENG-AS-AP - TIANFENG (HONG KONG) COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, HK · not in PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS149430, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 172.252.59.0/24 | Invalid: origin | Other origin only | 1 0%low visibility |
| 45.192.134.0/23 | Valid | Other IRR onlyRADB | 671 100% |
| 103.158.83.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 672 100% |
| 122.10.100.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 672 100% |
| 122.10.102.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 672 100% |
| 43.255.53.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 671 100% |
AS-SET
AS149430 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 4 are in fix.csv.
- ROA: origin1
- Route object: none1
- Route object: RIR1
- Route object: not announced1
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| ROA: origin | 172.252.59.0/24 | ROAs covering it name AS212238, not AS149430. If AS149430 should announce it, add a ROA for AS149430. |
| Route object: none | 172.252.59.0/24 | Route objects for it name AS212238. Add a route object with origin AS149430 in the RIR database for the space. |
| Route object: RIR | 45.192.134.0/23 | Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS149430 whose prefix no peer sees AS149430 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 103.129.55.0/24 | APNIC | Valid |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.