bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS142192 RRRL NET AS142192

Registry name: RRRLNET-AS-AP - RRRL NET, BD · PeeringDB

6IPv4 routes 50.0% RPKI valid · 50.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
3RPKI invalid 3 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 3 with no route object for this origin
3Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
4Route objects not announced registered with origin AS142192, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS142192, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

103.165.158.0/24 Invalid: origin Other origin only 2 0%low visibility 2
103.165.161.0/24 Invalid: origin Other origin only 2 0%low visibility 2
45.119.121.0/24 Invalid: origin Other origin only 1 0%low visibility 1
192.232.62.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 68
192.232.63.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 67
202.94.165.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 68

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS142192: AS-142192-RRRLNET-BD. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS142192 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS142192 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS142192 in itNot covered
AS-142192-RRRLNET-BD In no IRR database read today.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 11 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: origin3
  • Route object: none3
  • AS-SET: not found1
  • Route object: not announced4
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: origin103.165.158.0/24ROAs covering it name AS142045, not AS142192. If AS142192 should announce it, add a ROA for AS142192.2 of 673
Route object: none103.165.158.0/24Route objects for it name AS142045. Add a route object with origin AS142192 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
ROA: origin103.165.161.0/24ROAs covering it name AS142044, not AS142192. If AS142192 should announce it, add a ROA for AS142192.2 of 673
Route object: none103.165.161.0/24Route objects for it name AS142044. Add a route object with origin AS142192 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
ROA: origin45.119.121.0/24ROAs covering it name AS137579, not AS142192. If AS142192 should announce it, add a ROA for AS142192.1 of 673
Route object: none45.119.121.0/24Route objects for it name AS137579. Add a route object with origin AS142192 in the RIR database for the space.1 of 673
AS-SET: not foundAS-142192-RRRLNET-BDPeeringDB names AS-142192-RRRLNET-BD; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS142192 whose prefix no peer sees AS142192 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

192.232.62.0/23APNICValid
2001:df6:6d80::/48APNICValid
2001:df6:8f40::/48APNICValid
2407:4ac0::/32APNICValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.