bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS138542 ZTINFO-AS-HK - ZT Information Network Co., Limited

Registry name: ZTINFO-AS-HK - ZT Information Network Co., Limited, HK · not in PeeringDB

7IPv4 routes 85.7% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
3Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
3Route objects not announced registered with origin AS138542, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS138542, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

79.109.48.0/20 No ROA RIR databaseAPNIC 1 0%low visibility 1
79.109.0.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 67
79.109.7.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 67
79.109.64.0/18 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 67
79.109.240.0/21 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 67
79.109.128.0/18 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 60 9%low visibility 20
79.109.192.0/19 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 60 9%low visibility 20

AS-SET

AS138542 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 4 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: not announced3
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none79.109.48.0/20No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS138542, maxLength 20.1 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS138542 whose prefix no peer sees AS138542 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

79.109.36.0/22APNICInvalid: origin
79.109.240.0/22APNICValid
79.109.244.0/22APNICValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.