bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS138064 Jinom Network Indonesia

Registry name: JINOM-AS-ID - PT. Jinom Network Indonesia, ID · PeeringDB

10IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
6Route objects not announced registered with origin AS138064, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS138064, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

38.3.160.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 673 100% 69
103.122.64.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyALTDB, RADB 673 100% 69
103.122.65.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyALTDB, RADB 673 100% 69
103.122.66.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyALTDB, RADB 673 100% 69
103.122.67.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyALTDB, RADB 673 100% 69
103.175.82.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyALTDB, RADB 673 100% 69
103.70.92.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyALTDB, RADB 672 100% 69
103.70.93.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyALTDB, RADB 672 100% 69
103.175.83.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyALTDB, RADB 2 0%low visibility 2
38.80.75.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN, RADB 671 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS138064: AS138064:AS-JINOM-ID. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS138064 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS138064 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS138064 in itNot covered
AS138064:AS-JINOM-ID APNIC 1116 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 15 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR9
  • Route object: not announced6
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR38.3.160.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.122.64.0/24Route object only in ALTDB, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.122.65.0/24Route object only in ALTDB, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.122.66.0/24Route object only in ALTDB, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.122.67.0/24Route object only in ALTDB, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.175.82.0/24Route object only in ALTDB, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.70.92.0/24Route object only in ALTDB, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR103.70.93.0/24Route object only in ALTDB, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR103.175.83.0/24Route object only in ALTDB, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS138064 whose prefix no peer sees AS138064 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

103.122.64.0/22APNIC, RADBValid
2403:8c40::/32ALTDB, RADBValid
2403:8c40:64::/48ALTDBValid
2403:8c40:65::/48ALTDBValid
2403:8c40:66::/48ALTDBValid
2403:8c40:67::/48ALTDBValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.