bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS137908 Moefire Network

Registry name: MOEFIRE-AS-AP - Lin Siqi, CN · PeeringDB

0IPv4 routes
10IPv6 routes 80.0% RPKI valid · 80.0% with a route object
1RPKI invalid 1 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 2 with no route object for this origin
2Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
29Route objects not announced registered with origin AS137908, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS137908, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

2602:f9ba:a8::/48 Invalid: origin None 2 0%low visibility 3
2a14:7580:740::/44 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 634 100% 69
2a14:67c1:a110::/44 Valid Other origin only 2 0%low visibility 3
2406:840:ee41::/48 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 635 100% 69
2406:840:ee4b::/48 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 635 100% 69
2406:840:feaf::/48 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 635 100% 69
2406:840:ee40::/48 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 634 100% 70
2406:840:ee44::/48 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 634 100% 68
2406:840:ee4d::/48 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 634 100% 68
2a13:a5c3:ff50::/44 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 634 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS137908: AS137908:AS-MOEFIRE. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS137908 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS137908 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS137908 in itNot covered
AS137908:AS-MOEFIRE APNIC 1137 Yes 2

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 33 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: origin1
  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: none2
  • Route object: not announced29
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: origin2602:f9ba:a8::/48ROAs covering it name AS393577, not AS137908. If AS137908 should announce it, add a ROA for AS137908.2 of 636
Route object: none2602:f9ba:a8::/48No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS137908 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 636
ROA: none2a14:7580:740::/44No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS137908, maxLength 44.634 of 636
Route object: none2a14:67c1:a110::/44Route objects for it name AS208754. Add a route object with origin AS137908 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS137908 whose prefix no peer sees AS137908 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

206.83.8.0/24ARINInvalid: origin
2406:840:ee40::/44APNIC, RADBValid
2406:840:ee40::/45APNICValid
2406:840:ee40::/46APNICValid
2406:840:ee40::/47APNICValid
2406:840:ee42::/47APNICValid
2406:840:ee42::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee43::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee44::/46APNICValid
2406:840:ee44::/47APNICValid
2406:840:ee45::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee46::/47APNICValid
2406:840:ee46::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee47::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee48::/45APNICValid
2406:840:ee48::/46APNICValid
2406:840:ee48::/47APNICValid
2406:840:ee48::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee49::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee4a::/47APNICValid
2406:840:ee4a::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee4c::/46APNICValid
2406:840:ee4c::/47APNICValid
2406:840:ee4c::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee4e::/47APNICValid
2406:840:ee4e::/48APNICValid
2406:840:ee4f::/48APNICValid
2602:fd60:ff0::/48ALTDBValid
2a0f:9400::/48RIPEInvalid: origin

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.