bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS137488 ICEWARP-AS-AP - IceWarp Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Registry name: ICEWARP-AS-AP - IceWarp Technologies Pvt. Ltd., IN · not in PeeringDB

7IPv4 routes 71.4% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
2No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
1Route objects not announced registered with origin AS137488, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS137488, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
103.110.83.0/24 No ROA RIR databaseAPNIC, RADB 671 100% 67
103.137.165.0/24 No ROA RIR databaseAPNIC 670 100% 67
103.161.42.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 66
103.161.43.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 66
161.248.74.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 66
161.248.75.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 66
185.119.219.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66

AS-SET

AS137488 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 3 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none2
  • Route object: not announced1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none103.110.83.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS137488, maxLength 24.671 of 673
ROA: none103.137.165.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS137488, maxLength 24.670 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS137488 whose prefix no peer sees AS137488 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

2001:df4:6700::/48RADBNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.