bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS136377 Linkwave Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Registry name: Linkwave-AS - Linkwave Technologies Pvt. Ltd, IN · PeeringDB

8IPv4 routes 87.5% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
53Route objects not announced registered with origin AS136377, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS136377, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

103.144.118.0/23 No ROA RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 66
103.99.12.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 66
103.99.13.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 66
103.99.14.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 66
103.99.15.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 66
103.144.118.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 66
103.144.119.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 66
103.99.12.0/22 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 6 1%low visibility 4

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS136377: APNIC::AS136377:AS-CUSTOMERS. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS136377 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS136377 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS136377 in itNot covered
APNIC::AS136377:AS-CUSTOMERS APNIC 4168 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 54 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: not announced53
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none103.144.118.0/23No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS136377, maxLength 23.672 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS136377 whose prefix no peer sees AS136377 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

103.99.12.0/23APNICValid
103.99.14.0/23APNICValid
2405:27c0::/32APNICValid
2405:27c0::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:1::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:2::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:3::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:4::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:5::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:6::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:7::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:8::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:9::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:a::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:b::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:c::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:d::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:e::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:f::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:10::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:11::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:12::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:13::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:14::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:15::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:16::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:17::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:18::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:19::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:1a::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:1b::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:1c::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:1d::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:1e::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:1f::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:20::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:21::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:22::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:23::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:24::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:25::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:26::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:27::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:28::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:29::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:2a::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:2b::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:2c::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:2d::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:2e::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:2f::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:30::/48APNICValid
2405:27c0:31::/48APNICValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.