Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS136250 ZQHWL-AS-AP - ZhongShanShi QiYi HuDong WangLuoKeJi Ltd
Registry name: ZQHWL-AS-AP - ZhongShanShi QiYi HuDong WangLuoKeJi Ltd, CN · not in PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS136250, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 162.4.136.0/24 | Valid | Nonecovered by 162.4.136.0/23 | 65 10%low visibility |
| 162.4.136.0/23 | Valid | Other IRR onlyRADB | 670 100% |
AS-SET
AS136250 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 2 are in fix.csv.
- Route object: none1
- Route object: RIR1
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Route object: none | 162.4.136.0/24 | No route object for it. A route object for 162.4.136.0/23 with origin AS136250 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS136250 in the RIR database for the space. |
| Route object: RIR | 162.4.136.0/23 | Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space. |
Route objects not announced
Every route object with origin AS136250 is announced.
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.