bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS134497 Cine Cebu

Registry name: CINE-AS-AP - Cine Cebu, PH · PeeringDB

4IPv4 routes 50.0% RPKI valid · 50.0% with a route object
5IPv6 routes 80.0% RPKI valid · 80.0% with a route object
1RPKI invalid 0 origin · 1 maxLength
2No ROA 3 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
2Route objects not announced registered with origin AS134497, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS134497, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

2400:6860:c000::4/127 Invalid: maxLength Nonecovered by 2400:6860:c000::/34 1 0%low visibility 1
38.20.178.0/24 No ROA Nonecovered by 38.20.178.0/23 672 100% 67
38.20.179.0/24 No ROA Nonecovered by 38.20.178.0/23 671 100% 66
103.161.60.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC, RADB 673 100% 69
103.161.61.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC, RADB 672 100% 66
2400:6860::/34 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 636 100% 69
2400:6860:4000::/34 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 636 100% 69
2400:6860:8000::/34 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 636 100% 69
2400:6860:c000::/34 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 636 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS134497: AS134497:AS-CINEPH. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS134497 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS134497 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS134497 in itNot covered
AS134497:AS-CINEPH APNIC 211,798 Yes 1

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 8 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: maxLength1
  • ROA: none2
  • Route object: none3
  • Route object: not announced2
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: maxLength2400:6860:c000::4/127ROA 2400:6860:c000::/34 AS134497 has maxLength 34; the route is a /127. Raise the maxLength, or add a ROA for 2400:6860:c000::4/127.1 of 636
Route object: none2400:6860:c000::4/127No route object for it. A route object for 2400:6860:c000::/34 with origin AS134497 covers it (too long for filters allowing more-specifics up to /48). Add a route object with origin AS134497 in the RIR database for the space.1 of 636
ROA: none38.20.178.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS134497, maxLength 24.672 of 673
Route object: none38.20.178.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 38.20.178.0/23 with origin AS134497 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS134497 in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
ROA: none38.20.179.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS134497, maxLength 24.671 of 673
Route object: none38.20.179.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 38.20.178.0/23 with origin AS134497 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS134497 in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS134497 whose prefix no peer sees AS134497 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

38.20.178.0/23RADBNo ROA
103.161.60.0/23APNIC, NTTCOMValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.