bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS13378 QINGYE-CLOUD

Registry name: QINGYE-CLOUD - Qingye Cloud, US · PeeringDB

6IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 0.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 1 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
13Route objects not announced registered with origin AS13378, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS13378, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

2602:f7b8:4::/48 Valid Nonecovered by 2602:f7b8::/40 636 100% 67
103.245.25.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 672 100% 66
103.245.24.0/23 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 665 99% 67
103.151.4.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 433 64% 65
103.178.56.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC, RADB 433 64% 65
103.245.24.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 433 64% 65
23.129.76.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN, NTTCOM 88 13% 45

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS13378: ARIN::AS-QINGYE. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS13378 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS13378 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS13378 in itNot covered
ARIN::AS-QINGYE ARIN1 member set in no database: AS-DUOTU 101239 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 15 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: none1
  • AS-SET: missing member1
  • Route object: not announced13
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: none2602:f7b8:4::/48No route object for it. A route object for 2602:f7b8::/40 with origin AS13378 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS13378 in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
AS-SET: missing memberARIN::AS-QINGYEAS-QINGYE (ARIN) lists AS-DUOTU; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS13378 whose prefix no peer sees AS13378 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

23.129.76.0/23RADBNo ROA
43.248.184.0/21RADBValid
95.82.8.0/23RADBValid
103.40.12.0/22NTTCOMValid
103.45.160.0/22NTTCOMValid
103.151.5.0/24APNICValid
103.205.252.0/22NTTCOMValid
103.239.244.0/22NTTCOMValid
111.223.12.0/22NTTCOMValid
156.239.237.0/24RADBValid
2001:df2:c240::/48APNICValid
2602:f7b8::/40ARINValid
2602:f7b8:5::/48RADBValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.