bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS132637 BITSNETID

Registry name: BITSNET-AS-ID - PT BINA INFORMATIKA SOLUSI, ID · PeeringDB

6IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 33.3% with a route object
2IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 4 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
5Route objects not announced registered with origin AS132637, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS132637, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

103.19.56.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 103.19.56.0/22 673 100% 69
103.19.57.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 103.19.56.0/22 673 100% 69
103.19.58.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 103.19.56.0/22 673 100% 69
103.19.59.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 103.19.56.0/22 673 100% 69
103.143.244.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 69
103.143.245.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 673 100% 69
2405:60c0::/32 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 636 100% 70
2402:32c0::/32 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC 635 100% 70

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS132637: AS132637:AS-BITSNET. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS132637 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS132637 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS132637 in itNot covered
AS132637:AS-BITSNET In no IRR database read today.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 10 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: none4
  • AS-SET: not found1
  • Route object: not announced5
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: none103.19.56.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 103.19.56.0/22 with origin AS132637 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS132637 in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: none103.19.57.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 103.19.56.0/22 with origin AS132637 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS132637 in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: none103.19.58.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 103.19.56.0/22 with origin AS132637 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS132637 in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: none103.19.59.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 103.19.56.0/22 with origin AS132637 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS132637 in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
AS-SET: not foundAS132637:AS-BITSNETPeeringDB names AS132637:AS-BITSNET; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS132637 whose prefix no peer sees AS132637 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

103.19.56.0/22APNICValid
103.80.238.0/23REACHInvalid: origin
103.80.238.0/24REACHInvalid: origin
103.80.239.0/24REACHInvalid: origin
103.143.244.0/23APNICValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.