Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS12833 GigaPIX Route Servers
Registry name: GigaPix Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P., PT · PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS12833, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 193.236.100.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 669 99% |
AS-SET
PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS12833: RIPE::AS-GIGAPIX-RS. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS12833 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS12833 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.
| Name | Database | ASNs | Sets | AS12833 in it | Not covered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIPE::AS-GIGAPIX-RS | RIPE | 53 | 1 | No | 1 |
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 2 are in fix.csv.
- AS-SET: own ASN1
- Route object: not announced1
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| AS-SET: own ASN | RIPE::AS-GIGAPIX-RS | AS12833 isn't in AS-GIGAPIX-RS (RIPE) once expanded. Add AS12833 to it. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS12833 whose prefix no peer sees AS12833 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 2001:7f8:a::/48 | RIPE | No ROA |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.